
Larys Makes Alicent Complicit in Violence
THE THEORY
Alicent's continued proximity to Larys, despite his escalating offers of extreme violence, is not reluctant tolerance but a functional arrangement she sustains through performed horror rather than actual refusal. Larys is not her instrument; she is becoming the political cover his ambitions require. The complicity is not approaching, it is already complete, and the next act of violence will confirm it.
How This Theory Works
Larys has positioned himself as Alicent's shadow capacity for violence, and each offer he makes without consequence deepens her structural reliance on him. When he tells her that if it is an eye she wants, she merely has to ask, he is not being helpful. He is making her a participant in the logic of that offer simply by letting it stand unanswered. Her recoil is noted, but so is the fact that she keeps him close. That pattern is the mechanism.
Alicent's expressed goal is that honor and decency will eventually prevail over Rhaenyra's offenses. But the person she retains as an ally operates on the opposite principle entirely. Larys has already signaled willingness to cut out tongues, burn families, and kill the king. None of those offers have been refused with finality. The gap between what Alicent says she believes and who she keeps in her pocket is where the theory lives.
What the theory does not yet say plainly is this: Alicent's recoil is not resistance. It is performance, and possibly self-deception. She is not a woman horrified by a tool she cannot bring herself to discard. She is a woman who needs the tool to remain available and has learned that recoiling is the precise gesture that keeps her hands formally clean while the tool stays sharp. Her horror is the alibi. Larys understands this better than she does, which is why he keeps raising the stakes of his offers rather than withdrawing them. He is not testing her limits. He is training her to have none.
The next atrocity will not require her to ask for it. Larys reads her distress as authorization, her silence as instruction, and her proximity as consent. The structure they have built together guarantees that when violence arrives, Alicent will be its author in every way that matters and its deniable bystander in every way she needs.
Is this theory convincing?
Key Evidence
Larys Offers An Eye Unprompted
Larys tells Alicent that if it's an eye she wants, she merely has to ask, volunteering extreme violence without being solicited, establishing that he operates ahead of her explicit requests.
Alicent Recoils But Retains Him
Alicent visibly recoils at Larys's willingness to commit foul deeds but continues to keep him in her pocket, a behavioral pattern that signals tacit acceptance of the relationship's terms.
Extreme Acts Already On The Table
Larys's menu of offered services includes killing the king, cutting out tongues, burning families, and taking children's eyes, a range so severe that any continued proximity to him implies Alicent's conditional tolerance of such methods.
Honor Rhetoric Versus Shadow Alliance
Alicent tells Criston she must believe honor and decency will prevail, yet the ally she relies on operates entirely outside those principles, making her stated values structurally incompatible with her actual political arrangement.






